Why twenty services, not a monolith
Welcome! I'm Param, and this is the advanced tier of the learnwithparam data engineering track. You already operate a four-service platform from the pipeline course. This course scales that shape to twenty services: Kafka, Snowflake, MLflow, Atlas, Prometheus, Grafana, Kubernetes, Terraform, and friends. Everything grounds in the companion workshop at github.com/learnwithparam/end-to-end-data-pipeline.
Twenty services sounds heavy. It is not. Each service owns one well-scoped job. The point of the full shape is to see the contracts between them clearly so when the managed platform equivalents (Databricks, Snowflake, Confluent) show up, you know what they are replacing.
The enterprise data platform
Batch on top, streaming on bottom, warehouse in the middle, observability on the right.
Not every service carries equal weight. Airflow, Kafka, Spark, Postgres, and FastAPI are the platform spine. MLflow, Atlas, Prometheus, and Grafana are the governance and observability layer and they matter at enterprise scale. MongoDB, Redis, InfluxDB, and Elasticsearch are optional stores for specific workloads. Never add a service because it is fashionable. Add it because a concern is unowned.
You can, up to a point. Minute-level Airflow runs work for near-real-time that tolerates ten to sixty second latency. Below that, the scheduler overhead dominates and you pay for a lot of container starts. Kafka is the right answer when you need event-driven consumers, sub-second p99, or exactly-once semantics. Use the simpler option first and move only when the SLA demands it.
Matching exercise: Match each service to the concern it owns
Loading practice…
Quiz: Quiz
Loading practice…